[CoovaChilli] Documentation about xt_coova/ipt-coova/nfcoova
pparent at comminter.com
Mon Jun 13 11:59:20 BST 2016
WAN is eth0.2, Lan is eth0.1
The iptables you sent seem similar don't they? (except that you filter source
and destination ip, but in my case it seems useless).
To my mind the problem is not likely to come from iptables, since it concern
only the phase when the user is unauthenticated. When the user is
authenticated everything works well.
Le lundi 13 juin 2016 22:43:00, vous avez écrit :
> Your rules look quite different to ours which look more like (where eth0 is
> your WAN):
> iptables -I FORWARD -o eth0 —src 192.168.1.0/24 -m coova --name chilli -j
> ACCEPT iptables -I FORWARD -i eth0 —dst 192.168.1.0/24 -m coova --name
> chilli --dest -j ACCEPT
> What is your WAN interface ? - we have rules for WAN and LAN interfaces.
> I think I recall David’s initial example config had dhcpif on eth0 but this
> should have been eth1.
> > On 13/06/2016, at 9:09 PM, Pierre Parent <pparent at comminter.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I just wanted to precise that I cross-compiled very recent version (
> > https://github.com/coova/coova-chilli/commit/67aa2f204695aaa23b065f7cd74ed
> > e7dd992c478 ) and I get exactly the same behavior (problems when
> > identifying with xt-coova).
> > I may try to get into the code to debug from within, when I have time.
> > Enclosed my current Recipe to compile recent version of coova-chilli for
> > openwrt.
> > Should I report this bug in github as well?
> > Pierre.
> > _______________________________________________
> > CoovaChilli mailing list
> > CoovaChilli at brightonchilli.org.uk
> > https://www.brightonchilli.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/coovachilli
More information about the CoovaChilli